From: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | Durgamahesh Manne <maheshpostgres9(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Regarding query optimisation (select for update) |
Date: | 2025-07-15 12:43:59 |
Message-ID: | c116cd0011bb36a55f58274daecf4464a23911e7.camel@cybertec.at |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, 2025-07-15 at 15:40 +0530, Durgamahesh Manne wrote:
> We are facing issues with slow running query
> SELECT betid, versionid, betdata, processed, messagetime, createdat, updatedat
> FROM praermabetdata where processed = 'false'
> ORDER BY betid, versionid LIMIT 200 OFFSET 0 FOR UPDATE;
>
> QUERY PLAN
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Limit (cost=0.28..1.89 rows=1 width=78)
> -> LockRows (cost=0.28..1.89 rows=1 width=78)
> -> Index Scan using idx_praermabetdata_processed_betid_versionid on praermabetdata (cost=0.28..1.88 rows=1 width=78)
> Index Cond: (processed = false)
>
> image.png
>
> Do we have any alternative way to improve the performance?
> Sometimes processed column use true as well as false
Please provide EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS) output and use "log_lock_waits"
to see if you are hanging behind locks for a longer time.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Durgamahesh Manne | 2025-07-15 12:56:34 | Re: Regarding query optimisation (select for update) |
Previous Message | Rich Shepard | 2025-07-15 12:40:26 | Re: Syntax error needs explanation [RESOLVED] |