| From: | Bryan Green <dbryan(dot)green(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, Jakub Wartak <jakub(dot)wartak(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Add Windows support for backtrace_functions (MSVC only) |
| Date: | 2025-10-31 20:07:18 |
| Message-ID: | c04e5ca9-d1e1-48a6-acf3-0fd42f103ac0@gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/31/2025 1:46 PM, Euler Taveira wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2025, at 11:51 AM, Bryan Green wrote:
>> I had reservations about the value the tests were adding, and
>> considering I am getting more concern around having the tests than not
>> having them for this initial release I have decided to remove them. v4
>> patch is attached. It is the same as the initial 0001-* patch.
>>
>
> I spent some time on this patch. Here are some comments and suggestions.
>
Thanks for the review.
> +#ifdef _MSC_VER
> +#include <windows.h>
> +#include <dbghelp.h>
> +static bool win32_backtrace_symbols_initialized = false;
> +static HANDLE win32_backtrace_process = NULL;
> +#endif
>
> We usually a different style. Headers go to the top on the same section as
> system headers and below postgres.h. It is generally kept sorted. The same
Will fix. I will rework the style (error and otherwise) to follow the
project tradition.
> applies to variables. Add them near the other static variables. BTW does it need
> the win32_ prefix for a Window-only variable?
>
> + wchar_t buffer[sizeof(SYMBOL_INFOW) + MAX_SYM_NAME * sizeof(wchar_t)];
> + PSYMBOL_INFOW symbol;
>
> According to [1], SYMBOL_INFO is an alias that automatically selects ANSI vs
> UNICODE. Shouldn't we use it instead of SYMBOL_INFOW?
>
Good point. I was being overly explicit about wanting wide chars, but
you're right that the generic versions are the way to go.
> + elog(WARNING, "SymInitialize failed with error %lu", error);
>
> Is there a reason to continue if SymInitialize failed? It should return after
None at all. Will return immediately.
> printing the message. Per the error message style guide [2], my suggestion is
> "could not initialize the symbol handler: error code %lu". You can also use
> GetLastError() directly in the elog call.
>
> + symbol = (PSYMBOL_INFOW) buffer;
> + symbol ->MaxNameLen = MAX_SYM_NAME;
> + symbol ->SizeOfStruct = sizeof(SYMBOL_INFOW);
>
> We generally don't add spaces between variable and a member.
>
> + DWORD i;
>
> I'm curious why did you declare this variable as DWORD? Shouldn't int be
> sufficient? The CaptureStackBackTrace function returns an unsigned short
> (UShort). You can also declare it in the for loop.
>
Out of habit. I will change it to int.
> + DWORD64 address = (DWORD64) (stack[i]);
>
> The parenthesis around stack is superfluous. The code usually doesn't contain
> additional parenthesis (unless it improves readability).
>
I will remove the parenthesis.
> + if (frames == 0)
> + {
> + appendStringInfoString(&errtrace, "\nNo stack frames captured");
> + edata->backtrace = errtrace.data;
> + return;
> + }
>
> It seems CaptureStackBackTrace function may return zero frames under certain
> conditions. It is a good point having this additional message. I noticed that
> the current code path (HAVE_BACKTRACE_SYMBOLS) doesn't have this block. IIUC,
> in certain circumstances (ARM vs unwind-tables flag), the backtrace() also
> returns zero frames. Should we add this block for the backtrace() code path?
>
Probably, though that seems like separate cleanup. Want me to include it
here or handle separately (in another patch)?
> + sym_result = SymFromAddrW(win32_backtrace_process,
> + address,
> + &displacement,
> + symbol);
>
> You should use SymFromAddr, no? [3] I saw that you used the Unicode functions
> instead of the generic functions [4].
>
> + /* Convert symbol name to UTF-8 */
> + utf8_len = WideCharToMultiByte(CP_UTF8, 0, symbol->Name, -1,
> + NULL, 0, NULL, NULL);
> + if (utf8_len > 0)
> + {
> + char *filename_utf8;
> + int filename_len;
> +
> + utf8_buffer = palloc(utf8_len);
> + WideCharToMultiByte(CP_UTF8, 0, symbol->Name, -1,
> + utf8_buffer, utf8_len, NULL, NULL);
>
> + /* Convert symbol name to UTF-8 */
> + utf8_len = WideCharToMultiByte(CP_UTF8, 0, symbol->Name, -1,
> + NULL, 0, NULL, NULL);
>
> You are calling WideCharToMultiByte twice. The reason is to allocate the exact
> memory size. However, you can adopt another logic to avoid the first call.
>
> maxlen = symbol->NameLen * pg_database_encoding_max_length();
> symbol_name = palloc(maxlen + 1);
>
> (I suggest symbol_name instead of ut8_buffer.)
>
> You are considering only the UTF-8 case. Shouldn't it use wcstombs or
> wcstombs_l? Maybe (re)use wchar2char -- see pg_locale_libc.c.
>
Hmm, you're probably right. I was thinking these Windows API strings
needed special handling, but wchar2char should handle the conversion to
database encoding correctly. Let me test that approach.
> + if (filename_len > 0)
> + {
> + filename_utf8 = palloc(filename_len);
> + WideCharToMultiByte(CP_UTF8, 0, line.FileName, -1,
> + filename_utf8, filename_len,
> + NULL, NULL);
> +
> + appendStringInfo(&errtrace,
> + "\n%s+0x%llx [%s:%lu]",
> + utf8_buffer,
> + (unsigned long long) displacement,
> + filename_utf8,
> + (unsigned long) line.LineNumber);
> +
> + pfree(filename_utf8);
> + }
> + else
> + {
> + appendStringInfo(&errtrace,
> + "\n%s+0x%llx [0x%llx]",
> + utf8_buffer,
> + (unsigned long long) displacement,
> + (unsigned long long) address);
> + }
>
> Maybe I missed something but is there a reason for not adding the address in the
> first condition?
>
No particular reason. I was trying to keep it concise when we have file/
line info, but for consistency it probably should be there.
Will send v5 with these fixes.
>
> [1] https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/dbghelp/ns-dbghelp-symbol_infow
> [2] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/error-style-guide.html
> [3] https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/dbghelp/nf-dbghelp-symfromaddrw
> [4] https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/intl/conventions-for-function-prototypes
>
>
Thanks again for the review,
Bryan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nathan Bossart | 2025-10-31 20:12:47 | Re: another autovacuum scheduling thread |
| Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2025-10-31 20:03:14 | Re: POC: Parallel processing of indexes in autovacuum |