Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16?

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16?
Date: 2023-04-17 18:02:15
Message-ID: c007f3c9a5f2866aa2c0b90680eb22cf9f5b58c3.camel@j-davis.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 2023-04-17 at 08:23 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > I don't object to this patch.  I suggest waiting until next week to
> > commit
> > it and then see what happens.  It's easy to revert if it goes
> > terribly.
>
> Is this still being considered for v16 ?

Yes, unless someone raises a procedural objection.

Is now a reasonable time to check it in and see what breaks? It looks
like there are quite a few buildfarm members that specify neither --
with-icu nor --without-icu.

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2023-04-17 18:26:22 Re: v16dev: TRAP: failed Assert("size > SizeOfXLogRecord"), File: "xlog.c", Line: 1055, PID: 13564
Previous Message Andres Freund 2023-04-17 18:00:09 Re: v16dev: TRAP: failed Assert("size > SizeOfXLogRecord"), File: "xlog.c", Line: 1055, PID: 13564