From: | "Ross, Brenton" <brenton(dot)ross(at)transigo(dot)net(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | "'pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Distributed Applications |
Date: | 1998-07-15 23:37:35 |
Message-ID: | c=AU%a=_%p=Telstra_Applied%l=AEBS_NT1-980715233735Z-1373@aebs-nt1.aebs.transigo.net.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
Hi,
I am planning to do a distributed application (using CORBA), with
PostgreSQL as the supporting DBMS. What I need is a means of getting
the separate processes to share in a single transaction.
I have prototyped up a program which can do this by opening a connection
to the DBMS and then accepting connections from the application
processes and passing the data straight through. (It catches the
opening and closing stuff.) This seems to work OK.
I had to assume that the file descriptors for the connection would be
always the same. I see in one of the postings that there will soon be
call that can get this. I also have made some extreme assumptions about
the connection protocol - but I can use the source code to handle this
later. (I am only using 6.2 at the moment.)
I was wondering if anyone else was working on this problem. I did see a
reference to distributed databases in a recent posting, but not support
for distributed applications. My guess is that there will a lot of
demand for this in the near future.
Brenton
PS - I only subscribe to the interface digest, so I would appreciate
replies being copied direct to me.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-07-15 23:39:05 | Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 |
Previous Message | David Hartwig | 1998-07-15 22:16:02 | Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 |