From: | "Bupp Phillips" <hello(at)noname(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Windows port |
Date: | 2003-08-27 06:00:10 |
Message-ID: | bihhcr$26vc$1@news.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-ports |
Maybe I misunderstood, will Postgresql.org support a native Windows port or
will it always be an outside company that will do the Windows porting?
I would perfer one from Postgresql.org so that I can always get the latest
fixes without having to wait for the outside party to decide when and if
they are going to incorporate the changes.
Thanks
"Chris M" <chris(at)none(dot)none> wrote in message
news:big172$2stv$2(at)news(dot)hub(dot)org(dot)(dot)(dot)
> Please visit: http://techdocs.postgresql.org/guides/Windows
>
> PowerGres by SRA, UltraSQL by PeerDirect both are native
> Windows port. The latter seems stopping at beta4.
>
> "Bupp Phillips" <hello(at)noname(dot)com> news:bidp4j$n6e$1(at)news(dot)hub(dot)org(dot)(dot)(dot)
> > I here that a beta version of a native Windows port is available, where
> can
> > I download this for testing?
> >
> > One other question...it doesn't use Cygwin, does it?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Treat | 2003-08-27 19:26:06 | Re: Windows port |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-08-27 04:11:23 | Re: Windows port |