Re: Windows port

From: "Bupp Phillips" <hello(at)noname(dot)com>
To: pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Windows port
Date: 2003-08-27 06:00:10
Message-ID: bihhcr$26vc$1@news.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-ports

Maybe I misunderstood, will Postgresql.org support a native Windows port or
will it always be an outside company that will do the Windows porting?

I would perfer one from Postgresql.org so that I can always get the latest
fixes without having to wait for the outside party to decide when and if
they are going to incorporate the changes.

Thanks

"Chris M" <chris(at)none(dot)none> wrote in message
news:big172$2stv$2(at)news(dot)hub(dot)org(dot)(dot)(dot)
> Please visit: http://techdocs.postgresql.org/guides/Windows
>
> PowerGres by SRA, UltraSQL by PeerDirect both are native
> Windows port. The latter seems stopping at beta4.
>
> "Bupp Phillips" <hello(at)noname(dot)com> news:bidp4j$n6e$1(at)news(dot)hub(dot)org(dot)(dot)(dot)
> > I here that a beta version of a native Windows port is available, where
> can
> > I download this for testing?
> >
> > One other question...it doesn't use Cygwin, does it?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-ports by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2003-08-27 19:26:06 Re: Windows port
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-08-27 04:11:23 Re: Windows port