Re: New strategies for freezing, advancing relfrozenxid early

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New strategies for freezing, advancing relfrozenxid early
Date: 2022-12-20 09:01:49
Message-ID: bfd1cc1659137cb92a114aef34cb8211ba983110.camel@j-davis.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, 2022-12-18 at 14:20 -0800, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> Attached is v10, which fixes this issue, but using a different
> approach to the one I sketched here.

In 0001, it's fairly straightforward rearrangement and looks like an
improvement to me. I have a few complaints, but they are about pre-
existing code that you moved around, and I like that you didn't
editorialize too much while just moving code around. +1 from me.

--
Jeff Davis
PostgreSQL Contributor Team - AWS

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2022-12-20 09:11:52 Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply
Previous Message David Rowley 2022-12-20 08:51:37 Re: slab allocator performance issues