| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_get__*_ddl consolidation |
| Date: | 2026-03-20 13:31:11 |
| Message-ID: | bf49721a-a56f-4bdc-ac48-5d4dc1d01805@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2026-03-20 Fr 9:15 AM, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2026-Mar-19, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>> Greetings
>>
>> Euler Taveira and I have been working on consolidating these patches.
> Hmm, did you remove the permissions checking to dump objects? I thought
> we had concluded that these were needed -- ie. you have to have at least
> CONNECT to a database to be able to dump it, and so on. This way, the
> functions do not override a DBAs intention to hide the information, when
> they run REVOKE on the catalogs. I know this is a nonstandard thing to
> do, but some people do it nonetheless.
>
> https://postgr.es/m/202511131446.uzn4c25ljmd4@alvherre.pgsql
>
Oh, hmm, yes, I think we did. Will work on it.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jianghua Yang | 2026-03-20 13:32:46 | Re: [PATCH] initdb: Treat empty -U argument as unset username |
| Previous Message | Amul Sul | 2026-03-20 13:26:42 | Re: pg_waldump: support decoding of WAL inside tarfile |