Need another set of eyes on this

From: "James B(dot) Byrne" <byrnejb(at)harte-lyne(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Need another set of eyes on this
Date: 2021-01-25 19:17:42
Message-ID: beea3a62f7eacc3f7f69af8842832e8c.squirrel@webmail.harte-lyne.ca
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

I am recreating a test database with data provided for a series of future
exercises. Presently I am trying to understand why a simple insert statement
is not working. The user invoking this insert is 'postgres' and has superuser
privileges.

The error is this:

postgres : STATEMENT: INSERT INTO public.stock(
stock_num, manu_code, description, unit_price, unit, unit_descr)
VALUES (3, "SHM", "aluminum Bat", 180.00, "case", "12/case");
postgres : ERROR: 42703: column "SHM" does not exist at character 105
postgres : LOCATION: errorMissingColumn, parse_relation.c:3194
postgres : STATEMENT: INSERT INTO public.stock(
stock_num, manu_code, description, unit_price, unit, unit_descr)
VALUES (3, "SHM", "aluminum bat", 180.00, "case", "12/case");

The create script for this table is this:

-- Table: public.stock

-- DROP TABLE public.stock;

CREATE TABLE public.stock
(
stock_num smallint NOT NULL,
manu_code character(3) COLLATE pg_catalog."default",
description character(20) COLLATE pg_catalog."default",
unit_price money,
unit character(4) COLLATE pg_catalog."default",
unit_descr character(15) COLLATE pg_catalog."default"
)
WITH (
OIDS = FALSE
)
TABLESPACE pg_default;

ALTER TABLE public.stock
OWNER to hll_4gl_testing;

COMMENT ON TABLE public.stock
IS 'The stock table is a catalog of the items sold by the distributor.';

COMMENT ON COLUMN public.stock.stock_num
IS 'Stock number that identifies type of item';

COMMENT ON COLUMN public.stock.manu_code
IS 'Manufacturer code (foreign key to manufact table)';

COMMENT ON COLUMN public.stock.description
IS 'Description of item';

COMMENT ON COLUMN public.stock.unit_price
IS 'Price per item';

COMMENT ON COLUMN public.stock.unit
IS 'Unit by which item is ordered:
Each
Pair
Case
Box';

COMMENT ON COLUMN public.stock.unit_descr
IS 'Description of unit';
-- Index: stock_manu_code_idx

-- DROP INDEX public.stock_manu_code_idx;

CREATE INDEX stock_manu_code_idx
ON public.stock USING btree
(manu_code COLLATE pg_catalog."default" ASC NULLS LAST)
TABLESPACE pg_default;
-- Index: stock_stock_num_idx

-- DROP INDEX public.stock_stock_num_idx;

CREATE INDEX stock_stock_num_idx
ON public.stock USING btree
(stock_num ASC NULLS LAST)
TABLESPACE pg_default;

COMMENT ON INDEX public.stock_stock_num_idx
IS 'Index for stock numbers. Numbers may be duplicated by different
manufacturers.';
-- Index: stock_stock_num_manu_code_idx

-- DROP INDEX public.stock_stock_num_manu_code_idx;

CREATE UNIQUE INDEX stock_stock_num_manu_code_idx
ON public.stock USING btree
(stock_num ASC NULLS

There will be a foreign key constraint on manu_code to manufact.manu_code but
that is not yet implemented.

The reference to column "SHM" not existing has me confused. I am probably
missing something obvious but I cannot see what the problem is. Any help would
be most welcome.

Thanks,

--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
Unencrypted messages have no legal claim to privacy
Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail

James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB(at)Harte-Lyne(dot)ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message aNullValue (Drew Stemen) 2021-01-25 19:19:24 Re: Need another set of eyes on this
Previous Message Guillaume Lelarge 2021-01-25 06:38:48 Re: CLUSTER, VACUUM, and TABLESPACEs (oh my)