Re: restart point vs restartpoint in the docs

From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: restart point vs restartpoint in the docs
Date: 2025-12-02 11:31:50
Message-ID: bed2e39df879e4f391f6fb14edf1810df0a0b697.camel@cybertec.at
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Tue, 2025-12-02 at 10:36 +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> While doing something else I noticed that we have 25 uses of "restartpoint" and
> three "restart point":
>
> $ git grep -i "restartpoint[s]\?[ .,;]" doc/ | wc -l
>       25
> $ git grep -i "restart point[s]\?[ .,;]" doc/ | wc -l
>        3
>
> Any objection to applying the attached to make those three "restartpoint" to
> keep the docs consistent?

No objection - I think that is a clear improvement.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message PG Doc comments form 2025-12-02 16:06:07 Add "current_setting('role');" to trigger function examples of audit tables
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2025-12-02 09:36:30 restart point vs restartpoint in the docs