Re: Oddity in tuple routing for foreign partitions

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp
Cc: robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Oddity in tuple routing for foreign partitions
Date: 2018-04-27 01:23:14
Message-ID: be7fadae-8e0f-ef19-b012-31855ba59842@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018/04/27 10:01, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
> At Thu, 26 Apr 2018 21:16:38 +0900, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
>> (2018/04/26 20:06), Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
>>> Agreed on all points above.
>>
>> Thanks for reviewing!
>
> I'm happy if it helps you.

Thank you both for reviewing.

Regards,
Amit

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Dunstan 2018-04-27 02:13:58 Allow auto_explain to log to NOTICE
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2018-04-27 01:18:55 Re: PostgreSQL's handling of fsync() errors is unsafe and risks data loss at least on XFS