| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Shay Rojansky <roji(at)roji(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Stored procedures and out parameters |
| Date: | 2018-08-22 16:58:41 |
| Message-ID: | be5789db-f516-2b5d-6671-16cff0572c3e@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 22/08/2018 18:49, David G. Johnston wrote:
> What others have done doesn't change the situation that has arisen for
> PostgreSQL due to its implementation history.
What others have done seems relevant, because the whole reason these
questionable interfaces exist is to achieve compatibility across SQL
implementations. Otherwise you can just make a native SQL call directly.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vladimir Sitnikov | 2018-08-22 17:21:32 | Re: Stored procedures and out parameters |
| Previous Message | David Steele | 2018-08-22 16:56:01 | Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) |