Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Darafei Komяpa Praliaskouski <me(at)komzpa(dot)net>, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort
Date: 2018-04-10 13:15:38
Message-ID: be51ea9a-7d89-174f-6bb1-7e803852c7e0@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 4/9/18 11:56 AM, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
>
> Thank you very much for your efforts on reviewing this patch.
> I'm looking forward work with you on this feature for PG12.

Since there's a new patch I have changed the status to Needs Review and
moved the entry to the next CF.

Still, it seems to me that discussion and new patches will be required
to address Tom's concerns.

Regards,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-04-10 13:17:42 Re: [PATCH][PROPOSAL] Refuse setting toast.* reloptions when TOAST table does not exist
Previous Message Nikolay Shaplov 2018-04-10 13:11:47 Re: [PATCH][PROPOSAL] Refuse setting toast.* reloptions when TOAST table does not exist