| From: | Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | PGSQL Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | PostgreSQL licence |
| Date: | 2010-02-02 13:09:15 |
| Message-ID: | bddc86151002020509o62d50708qc9c76988ed88a49e@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Please have a look at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:PostgreSQL#License.3F
This guy is insisting that PostgreSQL is NOT released under the BSD licence,
a directly contradiction of the PostgreSQL page on licensing:
http://www.postgresql.org/about/licence
(At this point, I've noticed that the URL uses our UK spelling of "licence"
but the page itself contains the US English version "license")
Could someone clarify, is this guy indeed correct and the licence page needs
updating stating it's something similar to an MIT licence, or is he just
plain wrong? As it stands, the Wikipedia page on PostgreSQL says "similar
to the MIT License".
Thanks
Thom
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alban Hertroys | 2010-02-02 13:12:43 | Re: Is this the warning message I should pay attention on it, during table partition |
| Previous Message | Gavin Mu | 2010-02-02 12:43:26 | Re: Can LISTEN/NOTIFY deal with more than 100 every second? |