Re: Postgres Partitions Limitations (

From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: navbarry(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres Partitions Limitations (
Date: 2024-01-11 15:05:51
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 2024-01-11 at 14:44 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Thanks, applied and backpatched all the way.

Thanks for taking care of that!

Laurenz Albe

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Russell, John 2024-01-11 18:55:03 Question on doc for RETURNING clause
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2024-01-11 13:44:16 Re: Postgres Partitions Limitations (

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message vignesh C 2024-01-11 15:08:31 Re: Should the archiver process always make sure that the timeline history files exist in the archive?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2024-01-11 15:01:16 Re: A recent message added to pg_upgade