| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik(at)garret(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Sync scan & regression tests |
| Date: | 2023-08-31 09:45:34 |
| Message-ID: | bd9d8792-b734-f896-577c-3f32ce9429f6@iki.fi |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 29/08/2023 13:35, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 07/08/2023 03:55, Tom Lane wrote:
>> This is possibly explained by the fact that it uses (per its
>> extra_config)
>> 'shared_buffers = 10MB',
>> although it's done that for a long time and portals.out hasn't changed
>> since before chipmunk's latest success. Perhaps some change in an
>> earlier test script affected this?
>
> I changed the config yesterday to 'shared_buffers = 20MB', before seeing
> this thread. If we expect the regression tests to work with
> 'shared_buffers=10MB' - and I think that would be nice - I'll change it
> back. But let's see what happens with 'shared_buffers=20MB'. It will
> take a few days for the tests to complete.
With shared_buffers='20MB', the tests passed. I'm going to change it
back to 10MB now, so that we continue to cover that case.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
Neon (https://neon.tech)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Junwang Zhao | 2023-08-31 09:56:58 | Re: Should we use MemSet or {0} for struct initialization? |
| Previous Message | David Geier | 2023-08-31 09:39:49 | Re: Eliminate redundant tuple visibility check in vacuum |