From: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Can we have a new SQL callable function to get Postmaster PID? |
Date: | 2021-02-03 21:09:47 |
Message-ID: | bd778517-aaef-6576-3551-7dacccb237e0@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2/3/21 7:12 AM, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can we have a new function, say pg_postgres_pid(), to return
> postmaster PID similar to pg_backend_pid()? At times, it will be
> difficult to use OS level commands to get the postmaster pid of a
> backend to which it is connected. It's even worse if we have multiple
> postgres server instances running on the same system. I'm not sure
> whether it's safe to expose postmaster pid this way, but it will be
> useful at least for debugging purposes on say Windows or other
> non-Linux platforms where it's a bit difficult to get process id.
> Users can also look at the postmaster.pid file to figure out what's
> the current postmaster pid, if not using OS level commands, but having
> a SQL callable function makes life easier.
>
> The function can look like this:
> Datum
> pg_postgres_pid(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
> {
> PG_RETURN_INT32(PostmasterPid);
> }
>
> Thoughts?
>
Curious question - why do you actually need PID of the postmaster? For
debugging, I'd say it's not quite necessary - you can just attach a
debugger to the backend and print the PostmasterPid directly. Or am I
missing something?
regards
--
Tomas Vondra
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2021-02-03 21:13:11 | Re: Can we have a new SQL callable function to get Postmaster PID? |
Previous Message | David Steele | 2021-02-03 21:00:08 | Re: Next Commitfest Manager. |