| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v9.0 |
| Date: | 2018-01-31 15:22:25 |
| Message-ID: | bd02c46e-6dfe-362e-16ee-6f6bb8f9468b@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/30/18 21:55, Andres Freund wrote:
> I'm open to changing my mind on it, but it seems a bit weird that a
> feature that relies on a shlib being installed magically turns itself on
> if avaible. And leaving that angle aside, ISTM, that it's a complex
> enough feature that it should be opt-in the first release... Think we
> roughly did that right for e.g. parallellism.
That sounds reasonable, for both of those reasons.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2018-01-31 16:23:02 | Re: Wait for parallel workers to attach |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2018-01-31 15:17:37 | Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 |