Re: Postgres v MySQL 5.0

From: "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres v MySQL 5.0
Date: 2006-11-13 01:06:48
Message-ID: bcea965ddbdb583cd30dde5a1f94eb5c@biglumber.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> But frankly, I don't see any particular problem with the defaults.

random_page_cost anyone?

> It looks like initdb is doing a better job of detecting system sizing
> than it used to, and the default numbers are no longer embarrassingly
> low. The 524K of yesteryear *was* embarrassing, but 32MB seems enough
> larger to me.

Yes, it's gotten better, but we're not quite there yet. I think the new
ability to specify values in common terms like "MB" will help us out a
lot too (thanks Peter!)

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200611122003
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFFV8SPvJuQZxSWSsgRArJzAJ4pSZhk2OL52yy7MOHGvZCmPLSztQCffSoI
ZeQ7LR+A+LnvO+hQUKrS8uU=
=zIV3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-11-13 12:22:11 Re: Postgres v MySQL 5.0
Previous Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2006-11-13 00:58:33 Re: Postgres v MySQL 5.0