Re: Planning counters in pg_stat_statements (using pgss_store)

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>, "imai(dot)yoshikazu(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <imai(dot)yoshikazu(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, legrand legrand <legrand_legrand(at)hotmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Planning counters in pg_stat_statements (using pgss_store)
Date: 2021-07-26 03:35:01
Message-ID: bc3246a5-2a70-7021-5aba-f8ce24f41604@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2021/07/26 12:32, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 11:26:02PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> I attach a patch that splits the test and add a comment explaining the
>>> boundaries for the new query.
>>> Checked with and without forced invalidations.
>>
>> Pushed with a little cosmetic fooling-about.
>
> Thanks!

Thanks a lot!

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2021-07-26 04:04:00 Re: [Doc] Tiny fix for regression tests example
Previous Message Julien Rouhaud 2021-07-26 03:32:20 Re: Planning counters in pg_stat_statements (using pgss_store)