Re: Requesting advanced Group By support

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Arun Kumar <vak(dot)king(at)outlook(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Requesting advanced Group By support
Date: 2018-10-15 14:17:39
Message-ID: bbfb41f3-2bf3-b6ef-50d4-eb6d1a215b8f@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10/10/2018 19:59, Andres Freund wrote:
> Isn't the spec compliant thing that's missing dealing with unique not null?

I don't think that's what the original poster complained about, but you
are right that it's a known missing part. The reason it's missing is
that we can't record dependencies on not-null constraints. Some work on
that has been in progress for many years.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashwin Agrawal 2018-10-15 14:42:29 Re: Function to promote standby servers
Previous Message Laurenz Albe 2018-10-15 14:16:02 Re: Function to promote standby servers