Re: Invisible PROMPT2

From: Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Invisible PROMPT2
Date: 2019-11-13 18:03:08
Message-ID: bbe78f8f-4d33-fb53-0210-5f994d759387@anastigmatix.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/13/19 12:49 PM, David Fetter wrote:
>> Or just define %w as meaning "whitespace of the same width as
>> PROMPT1". You couldn't use it *in* PROMPT1, then, but I see
>> no use-case for that anyway.
>
> +1 for doing it this way. Would it make more sense to error out if
> somebody tried to set that in PROMPT1, or ignore it, or...?

Define it as "difference between PROMPT1's width and the total width
of non-%w elements in this prompt". Then it has a defined meaning in
PROMPT1 too (which could be arbitrary if it appears only once, but
has to be zero in case it appears more than once).

Easter egg: expand it to backspaces if used in PROMPT2 among other
stuff that's already wider than PROMPT1. ;)

Regards,
-Chap

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Dilger 2019-11-13 18:04:36 Re: Using multiple extended statistics for estimates
Previous Message Andres Freund 2019-11-13 18:02:00 Re: [PATCH] Improve AtSubCommit_childXids