Re: Minor fixes for upcoming version 13

From: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Minor fixes for upcoming version 13
Date: 2020-09-09 16:16:16
Message-ID: ba9da631-b0bf-63b6-c7eb-cb44317e3433@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello Tom,

09.09.2020 18:29, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Please consider fixing minor defects in the source code and documentation.
> I agree with all of these, except the markup fixes in bgworker.sgml
> still seem not right; it should be more like
>
> <function>RegisterBackgroundWorker(<type>BackgroundWorker</type> *<parameter>worker</parameter>)</function>
Yes, but I've tried to minimize the change and align with the adjacent
text. For example:
<para>Once running, the process can connect to a database by calling
   <function>BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnection(<parameter>char
*dbname</parameter>...
>> 6. "unhandled previous state in xqs" -> "unhandled previous state at end
>> quote"?
>> "xqs" is rather cryptic for a user-visible message
> But it's not user-visible is it? That should surely be a can't-happen
> case.
I've encountered this while translating NLS messages in postgres.po and
ecpg.po. So I think it should at least puzzle translators.

Best regards,
Alexander

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Naylor 2020-09-09 16:20:32 Re: Minor fixes for upcoming version 13
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2020-09-09 16:07:40 Re: Inconsistency in determining the timestamp of the db statfile.