Re: documentation about explicit locking

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: documentation about explicit locking
Date: 2018-07-31 01:03:44
Message-ID: ba672217-0acc-b7c9-f40c-a30f0e357e66@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018/07/31 5:25, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 20/07/2018 02:30, Amit Langote wrote:
>> We don't explicitly mention what locks we take on system catalogs
>> elsewhere, but CREATE COLLATION is different from other commands, so I'm
>> fine with adding more details as you suggest, so updated the text.
>
> committed the documentation change

Thank you.

Regards,
Amit

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2018-07-31 01:27:24 Re: documentation about explicit locking
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2018-07-31 00:02:45 Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Append implementation