From: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
---|---|
To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru> |
Subject: | Re: Usage of epoch in txid_current |
Date: | 2019-03-25 14:23:49 |
Message-ID: | b9a00fb9-a5aa-0975-fa62-d3ce248c71c4@iki.fi |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 25/03/2019 12:49, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 5:01 PM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> New version attached. I'd like to commit this for PG12.
>
> Here is a follow-up sketch patch that shows FullTransactionId being
> used in the transaction stack, so you can call eg
> GetCurrentFullTransactionId(). A table access method could use this
> to avoid the need to freeze stuff later (eg zheap).
>
> I suppose it's not strictly necessary, since you could use
> GetCurrentTransactionId() and infer the epoch by comparing with
> ReadNextFullTransactionId() (now that the epoch counting is reliable,
> due to patch 0001 which I'm repeating again here just for cfbot). But
> I suppose we want to get away from that sort of thing. Thoughts?
Looks good.
I started to write a patch to use XID & epoch in dealing with GiST page
deletions [1], and I really could've used an epoch to go with
RecentGlobalXmin. I presume that would be pretty straightforward to have
with this, too.
[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/5f7ed675-d1fc-66ef-f316-645080ff9625@iki.fi
- Heikki
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2019-03-25 14:24:05 | Re: Assert failure when validating foreign keys |
Previous Message | David Fetter | 2019-03-25 14:15:33 | Re: warning to publication created and wal_level is not set to logical |