| From: | Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | TRAP: failed Assert("offsets[i] > offsets[i - 1]"), File: "tidstore.c" |
| Date: | 2026-04-15 12:48:35 |
| Message-ID: | b97f1850-fc7b-43c4-9b04-4e97bb9e7dc0@gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Hi,
While experimenting with query plans, I periodically see test_tidstore
fail on the assertion in TidStoreSetBlockOffsets().
The cause is that the harness function do_set_block_offsets() forwards
the SQL array straight to TidStoreSetBlockOffsets(), which has an
explicit contract:
"The offset numbers 'offsets' must be sorted in ascending order."
array_agg() without ORDER BY gives no such guarantee, and plan shapes
that reshuffle the input can deliver the offsets out of order and trip
the Assert.
The issue is minor and doesn't expose any underlying bug, but it is
still worth fixing: it removes a source of flaky test runs and makes
life easier for extension developers who reuse the same pattern.
Patch attached.
--
regards, Andrei Lepikhov,
pgEdge
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v0-0001-Sort-offsets-in-test_tidstore-s-do_set_block_offs.patch | text/plain | 2.2 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2026-04-15 15:19:02 | Re: BUG #19456: # Unit-Labeling Issue: `pg_size_pretty()` Incorrectly Labels Binary Units as Decimal Units |
| Previous Message | SIEBERT Florent | 2026-04-15 11:59:46 | patroni-4.1.1-1PGDG.rhel9.7.noarch.rpm missing in https://download.postgresql.org/pub/repos/yum/common/redhat/rhel-9-x86_64/ |