From: | Mike Rylander <mrylander(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Russ Brown <pickscrape(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgresql-General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Fyracle? |
Date: | 2005-06-06 10:43:04 |
Message-ID: | b918cf3d05060603432c5d1be0@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 6/6/05, Russ Brown <pickscrape(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I've just been sent this link by our DBA (pro MySQL but even more
> Anti-Postgres):
>
> http://www.janus-software.com/fb_fyracle.html
>
> I want to know how they've calculated the numbers that they're created
> those pie graphs from. The only thing I can think of that Postgres
> doesn't have for 'transactions' is two-phase commit, and yet it's
> given it 1/2 functionality.
>
That is a bit harsh. I suppose the reviewer thinks ultra-slow
cross-machine transactions that have to be repaired by hand are really
fun. ;)
> Anybody else care to comment?
>
Their PL bullet point looks like postgres should have at least a
partial circle (..."in which languages? PL/SQL or similar, Java,
C/C++?...similar enough to your current database to allow for a fast
(automated) process"...).
--
Mike Rylander
mrylander(at)gmail(dot)com
GPLS -- PINES Development
Database Developer
http://open-ils.org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adam Witney | 2005-06-06 12:17:36 | Re: Large Object => invalid input syntax for integer: "" |
Previous Message | Richard Huxton | 2005-06-06 10:24:53 | Re: Fyracle? |