Re: Fyracle?

From: Mike Rylander <mrylander(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Russ Brown <pickscrape(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgresql-General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fyracle?
Date: 2005-06-06 10:43:04
Message-ID: b918cf3d05060603432c5d1be0@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 6/6/05, Russ Brown <pickscrape(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I've just been sent this link by our DBA (pro MySQL but even more
> Anti-Postgres):
>
> http://www.janus-software.com/fb_fyracle.html
>
> I want to know how they've calculated the numbers that they're created
> those pie graphs from. The only thing I can think of that Postgres
> doesn't have for 'transactions' is two-phase commit, and yet it's
> given it 1/2 functionality.
>

That is a bit harsh. I suppose the reviewer thinks ultra-slow
cross-machine transactions that have to be repaired by hand are really
fun. ;)

> Anybody else care to comment?
>

Their PL bullet point looks like postgres should have at least a
partial circle (..."in which languages? PL/SQL or similar, Java,
C/C++?...similar enough to your current database to allow for a fast
(automated) process"...).

--
Mike Rylander
mrylander(at)gmail(dot)com
GPLS -- PINES Development
Database Developer
http://open-ils.org

In response to

  • Fyracle? at 2005-06-06 10:12:05 from Russ Brown

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adam Witney 2005-06-06 12:17:36 Re: Large Object => invalid input syntax for integer: ""
Previous Message Richard Huxton 2005-06-06 10:24:53 Re: Fyracle?