| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
|---|---|
| To: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Add backendType to PGPROC, replacing isRegularBackend |
| Date: | 2026-02-03 20:55:20 |
| Message-ID: | b77e4962-a64a-43db-81a1-580444b3e8f5@iki.fi |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I propose a little refactoring, attached, to replace the
"isRegularBackend" field in PGPROC with full "backendType".
Andres briefly suggested this a while back [1]:
On Fri, 22 Nov 2024 at 22:13, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
wrote:
> Or we could have a copy of the backend type in PGPROC.
but we didn't follow up on that approach. I don't see why, it seems so
much simpler than what we ended up doing. Am I missing something?
- Heikki
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| 0001-Add-backendType-to-PGPROC-replacing-isRegularBackend.patch | text/x-patch | 6.8 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nathan Bossart | 2026-02-03 21:04:41 | Re: Add backendType to PGPROC, replacing isRegularBackend |
| Previous Message | Nathan Bossart | 2026-02-03 20:44:10 | Re: refactor architecture-specific popcount code |