Re: pg_verify_checksums and -fno-strict-aliasing

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_verify_checksums and -fno-strict-aliasing
Date: 2018-08-31 11:10:08
Message-ID: b696a5b6-8388-c616-5896-89c32cacc973@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 31/08/2018 01:37, Tom Lane wrote:
> The fact that some of these are pretty old and we've not noticed is
> not good. It suggests that we don't currently have any compilers in the
> buildfarm that under-align char[] arrays on the stack, which seems like
> a gotcha waiting to bite us. I wonder if there is any way to persuade
> some compiler on a non-Intel box to do that.

-Wcast-align=strict (requires gcc-8) warns about the issue in
pg_verify_checksums.c, but also about a handful^W^W15211 other things,
so it wouldn't be immediately useful.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-08-31 11:28:18 Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support
Previous Message Yugo Nagata 2018-08-31 10:52:43 Re: pg_verify_checksums -d option (was: Re: pg_verify_checksums -r option)