| From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Nicolas Seinlet <nicolas(at)seinlet(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_trgm upgrade to 1.6 led to load average increase |
| Date: | 2026-01-20 16:34:17 |
| Message-ID: | b6443638-9947-474b-ac5a-967e89142387@aklaver.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 1/20/26 00:50, Nicolas Seinlet wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we've upgraded the pg_trgm extension from 1.0 to 1.6 on our production
> database, while sticking our postgresql cluster version to 16. This led
> to an increase in the load average of the server (twice the load average
> on our use case). After investigation, we found our issue was linked to :
> https://github.com/postgres/postgres/
> commit/935f6666502250abde8615bc7805a6e5aa05a066 <https://github.com/
> postgres/postgres/commit/935f6666502250abde8615bc7805a6e5aa05a066>
>
> We issue queries like :
> SELECT model, res_id FROM ir_model_data WHERE module='base' AND
> name='public_user';
You need to provide the table definition, including indexes.
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Nicolas
>
>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Matt Magoffin | 2026-01-20 18:36:42 | Collation with upper and numeric comparing in unexpected way |
| Previous Message | Erik Wienhold | 2026-01-20 10:51:35 | Re: Request for cryptographic mechanisms used in PostgreSQL |