Re: PATCH: Exclude unlogged tables from base backups

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Adam Brightwell <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydata(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: Exclude unlogged tables from base backups
Date: 2018-01-30 01:44:16
Message-ID: b62e2983-1314-0027-d12e-c417a3e53002@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 1/29/18 8:10 PM, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 5:45 AM, Adam Brightwell
> <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydata(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 1:17 PM, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
>>>
>>> Whoops, my bad. Temp relations are stored in the db directories with a
>>> "t" prefix. Looks like we can take care of those easily enough but I
>>> think it should be a separate patch.
>>>
>>> I'll plan to submit that for CF 2018-03.
>
> +1
>
>>
>> I agree, I believe this should be a separate patch.
>>
>> As for the latest patch above, I have reviewed, applied and tested it.
>>
>> It looks good to me. As well, it applies cleanly against master at
>> (97d4445a03). All tests passed when running 'check-world'.
>>
>> If it is agreed that the temp file exclusion should be submitted as a
>> separate patch, then I will mark 'ready for committer'.
>
> Agreed, please mark this patch as "Ready for Committer".

I marked it just in case some enterprising committer from another time
zone swoops in and picks it up. Fingers crossed!

--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2018-01-30 02:03:00 Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v9.1
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2018-01-30 01:14:54 Re: STATISTICS retained in CREATE TABLE ... LIKE (INCLUDING ALL)?