Re: [PATCH] Document the order of changing certain settings when using hot-standby servers

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yorick Peterse <yorickpeterse(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Aleksander Alekseev <a(dot)alekseev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Document the order of changing certain settings when using hot-standby servers
Date: 2017-11-01 14:53:27
Message-ID: b5f57e20-c641-9aa5-8b57-185797fde644@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 9/1/17 13:00, Robert Haas wrote:
> Now you're proposing to add:
>
> If you want to increase these values you
> should do so on all standby servers first, before applying the changes to
> the primary. If you instead want to decrease these values you should do so
> on the primary first, before applying the changes to all standby servers.
>
> But that's just the obvious logical consequence of the existing statement.
>
> If we're going to add this text, I'd move it one sentence earlier and
> stick "Therefore, " at the beginning.

Committed incorporating that suggestion.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-11-01 15:11:54 Re: Account for cost and selectivity of HAVING quals
Previous Message Petr Jelinek 2017-11-01 14:49:17 Re: Walsender timeouts and large transactions