| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yorick Peterse <yorickpeterse(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Aleksander Alekseev <a(dot)alekseev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Document the order of changing certain settings when using hot-standby servers |
| Date: | 2017-11-01 14:53:27 |
| Message-ID: | b5f57e20-c641-9aa5-8b57-185797fde644@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 9/1/17 13:00, Robert Haas wrote:
> Now you're proposing to add:
>
> If you want to increase these values you
> should do so on all standby servers first, before applying the changes to
> the primary. If you instead want to decrease these values you should do so
> on the primary first, before applying the changes to all standby servers.
>
> But that's just the obvious logical consequence of the existing statement.
>
> If we're going to add this text, I'd move it one sentence earlier and
> stick "Therefore, " at the beginning.
Committed incorporating that suggestion.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-11-01 15:11:54 | Re: Account for cost and selectivity of HAVING quals |
| Previous Message | Petr Jelinek | 2017-11-01 14:49:17 | Re: Walsender timeouts and large transactions |