Re: [PATCH] hs_standby_disallowed test fix

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
Cc: Michail Nikolaev <michail(dot)nikolaev(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hs_standby_disallowed test fix
Date: 2020-05-18 14:23:23
Message-ID: b5d08ea2-8612-9b98-eb43-1e58631b009d@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020-05-12 19:35, Tom Lane wrote:
> Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> writes:
>> I just wonder why standbycheck regression test doesn't run by default
>> in buildfarm. Which caused us not to notice this issue long time. Maybe
>> because it's difficult to set up hot-standby environment in the
>> regression test? If so, we might need to merge standbycheck test into
>> TAP tests for recovery.
>
> It seems likely to me that the standbycheck stuff has been completely
> obsoleted by the TAP-based recovery tests. We should get rid of it,
> after adding any missing coverage to the TAP tests.

I have looked into this a few times. It should definitely be done, but
there is actually a fair amount of coverage in the standbycheck that is
not in a TAP test, so it would be a fair amount of careful leg work to
get this all moved over.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vik Fearing 2020-05-18 14:41:23 Missing grammar production for WITH TIES
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2020-05-18 14:20:16 Re: PG 13 release notes, first draft