| From: | Jeremy Schneider <schnjere(at)amazon(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Oracle vs PG |
| Date: | 2018-10-24 08:15:29 |
| Message-ID: | b57966d1-fc05-69cb-d285-b3a79baeb05a@amazon.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 10/23/18 13:45, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> On 10/23/18 12:58 PM, Ravi Krishna wrote:
>> Well it is Aurora.
>>
>> https://www.cnbc.com/2018/10/23/amazon-move-off-oracle-caused-prime-day-outage-in-warehouse.html
>
> Since the article was almost content-free I not would use it on either
> side of the argument. The only thing I pulled from it was Amazon changed
> databases and hit the learning curve. That will happen in either direction.
Werner tweeted about this earlier today too, if you didn't see it
https://twitter.com/Werner/status/1054901529478459392
-Jeremy
--
Jeremy Schneider
Database Engineer
Amazon Web Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-10-24 08:33:48 | Re: Should pg 11 use a lot more memory building an spgist index? |
| Previous Message | Ghislain ROUVIGNAC | 2018-10-24 07:48:11 | Portworx snapshots |