Re: Extending outfuncs support to utility statements

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Extending outfuncs support to utility statements
Date: 2022-09-26 14:46:49
Message-ID: b4ff5db0-387d-4aea-3f9c-956a068bc503@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 22.09.22 23:21, Tom Lane wrote:
> Anyway, this is a bit far afield from the stated topic of this
> thread. I think we should commit something approximately like
> what I posted and then start a new thread specifically about
> what we'd like to do about utility commands in new-style SQL
> functions.

Right, I have committed everything and will close the CF entry. I don't
have a specific idea about how to move forward right now.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2022-09-26 14:55:22 Re: Convert *GetDatum() and DatumGet*() macros to inline functions
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2022-09-26 14:39:36 Re: kerberos/001_auth test fails on arm CPU darwin