| From: | "Neil Conway" <neil(dot)conway(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Memory leak on hashed agg rescan |
| Date: | 2008-10-16 19:28:30 |
| Message-ID: | b4e5ce320810161228i4c713cc5y9da08b9a34aae19@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 5:26 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> It would probably be cleaner to take that logic out of build_hash_table
> altogether, and put it in a separate function to be called by
> ExecInitAgg.
Yeah, I considered that -- makes sense. Attached is the patch I
applied to HEAD, REL8_3_STABLE and REL8_2_STABLE.
Neil
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| hashed_agg_mem_leak-2.patch | application/octet-stream | 4.6 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-10-16 20:00:41 | Re: Deriving Recovery Snapshots |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-10-16 18:28:35 | Re: 8.3 .4 + Vista + MingW + initdb = ACCESS_DENIED |