Re: Adding \ev view editor?

From: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Adding \ev view editor?
Date: 2009-09-02 12:07:13
Message-ID: b42b73150909020507s4b4fd56au1330658112476d67@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Josh Berkus<josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> All,
>
> I've grown to adore the new \ef function editor.
>
> It doesn't seem like it would be that difficult to add a view editor as
> \ev.  While editors would also be good for other objects, I don't think
> we can do \et or \er etc. because those objects don't support CREATE OR
> REPLACE.
>
> Opinions?  Other objects which could take \e?

One reason I don't like this proposal is that postgresql does not
preserve the original 'create view' statement for editing. The
resulting sql that is given to you to edit is hopelessly mangled and I
think it's not good to encourage people to modify views in this
fashion.

Then again, we are only reproducing what pgadmin can already do, so why not? :-)

merlin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Nacos 2009-09-02 12:21:05 trigger SPI_exec count argument
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2009-09-02 12:02:46 window functions maybe bug