Re: suggestion: log_statement = sample

From: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com
Cc: Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: suggestion: log_statement = sample
Date: 2009-07-21 19:28:34
Message-ID: b42b73150907211228l77c613aepeb2c8757e2826636@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Joshua D. Drake<jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 13:24 -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
>>   In actual practice, full query logging
>> is 1/50 the amount of disk I/O as the actual database activity.  If your
>> systems are so stressed that they can't handle another 2% increase, then
>> you've got bigger problems lurking.
>
> It depends on the system. I have seen even big systems take a huge hit
> by full logging due to transactional velocity.
>
> Joshua D. Drake

I've seen this too. On high transaction load systems, log_statement
has big overhead. I haven't tested this lately though, and I suspect
this information is version dependent (in the 'old' days, it used to
be a really big deal).

merlin

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2009-07-21 19:32:07 Re: ERROR: could not access status of transaction 2495690984
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2009-07-21 18:29:12 Re: element from an array by its index