From: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Joshua Tolley <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com>, Shak <sshaikh(at)hotmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Using results from DELETE ... RETURNING |
Date: | 2009-06-05 23:03:52 |
Message-ID: | b42b73150906051603t3bd8a7cud672a0e2acb59832@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Joshua Tolley <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 04:21:27PM +0100, Shak wrote:
>>> Something like:
>>> SELECT COUNT(*) FROM (DELETE FROM a RETURNING *) ;
>>> sounds reasonable but results in a syntax error. I am able to return single
>>> results into a variable or record, but not more than one result.
>
>> You can't. It's on the TODO list (http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo)
>
> I think you can loop over the results in plpgsql, for instance
>
> for rec in DELETE FROM a RETURNING * loop
> ... do something with rec ...
> end loop;
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
also sql functions can direct 'returning' results directly to the
return of the function (at least in 8.4).
merlin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-06-05 23:13:43 | Re: Using results from DELETE ... RETURNING |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-06-05 22:51:53 | Re: Using results from DELETE ... RETURNING |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Emmanuel Cecchet | 2009-06-05 23:06:22 | Unique namespace per session for temp tables? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-06-05 22:51:53 | Re: Using results from DELETE ... RETURNING |