Re: Using results from DELETE ... RETURNING

From: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Joshua Tolley <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com>, Shak <sshaikh(at)hotmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Using results from DELETE ... RETURNING
Date: 2009-06-05 23:03:52
Message-ID: b42b73150906051603t3bd8a7cud672a0e2acb59832@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Joshua Tolley <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 04:21:27PM +0100, Shak wrote:
>>> Something like:
>>> SELECT COUNT(*) FROM (DELETE FROM a RETURNING *) ;
>>> sounds reasonable but results in a syntax error. I am able to return single
>>> results into a variable or record, but not more than one result.
>
>> You can't. It's on the TODO list (http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo).
>
> I think you can loop over the results in plpgsql, for instance
>
>        for rec in DELETE FROM a RETURNING * loop
>                ... do something with rec ...
>        end loop;
>
>                        regards, tom lane
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

also sql functions can direct 'returning' results directly to the
return of the function (at least in 8.4).

merlin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-06-05 23:13:43 Re: Using results from DELETE ... RETURNING
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-06-05 22:51:53 Re: Using results from DELETE ... RETURNING

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Emmanuel Cecchet 2009-06-05 23:06:22 Unique namespace per session for temp tables?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-06-05 22:51:53 Re: Using results from DELETE ... RETURNING