Re: Benchmark comparing PostgreSQL, MySQL and Oracle

From: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Sergio Lopez <sergio(dot)lopez(at)nologin(dot)es>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Benchmark comparing PostgreSQL, MySQL and Oracle
Date: 2009-02-20 20:40:16
Message-ID: b42b73150902201240i2433872dg6b43c53c7b582d99@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Jonah H. Harris <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Sergio Lopez <sergio(dot)lopez(at)nologin(dot)es>
> wrote:
>>
>> On the other hand, I've neved said that what I've done is the
>> Perfect-Marvelous-Definitive Benchmark, it's just a personal project,
>> and I don't have an infinite amount of time to invest on it.
>
> When you make comments such as "As for databases, both Oracle and MySQL show
> nice numbers, but it's PostgreSQL who stands in the top, giving consistent
> results with each environment and workload", you should make sure that your
> test is correct. Otherwise you're making statements without any real
> basis-in-fact.

ISTM you are the one throwing out unsubstantiated assertions without
data to back it up. OP ran benchmark. showed hardware/configs, and
demonstrated result. He was careful to hedge expectations and gave
rationale for his analysis methods.

If you think he's wrong, instead of picking on him why don't you run
some tests showing alternative results and publish them...leave off
the oracle results or use a pseudo-name or something.

merlin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Battle Mage 2009-02-20 21:34:23 postgreSQL performance 8.2.6 vs 8.3.3
Previous Message Jonah H. Harris 2009-02-20 19:55:05 Re: Benchmark comparing PostgreSQL, MySQL and Oracle