Re: visibility map - what do i miss?

From: "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: depesz(at)depesz(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: visibility map - what do i miss?
Date: 2008-12-06 16:00:45
Message-ID: b42b73150812060800p55234da5qdca6a4ce37814b8c@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 8:38 AM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> So what do we gather from this? Well, the feature works as
> advertised. I think that as long as your updates are not uniformly
> distributed across pages, vismap is a huge performance win for many
> workloads. I think the benefit will increase as the feature is
> tweaked in future versions. vacuum times are one of the things that
> make dealing with large tables difficult, and force us to use
> partitioning (which is, frankly, a hack).
>
> Why are new pages initialized dirty? Do inserts on pages set the dirty bit?

dumb question...there is no guarantee the transaction will be committed.

merlin

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sebastian Tennant 2008-12-06 16:02:40 Re: Resp.: Automatic insert statement generator?
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2008-12-06 15:36:01 Re: Unique constaint violated without being violated