Re: Query planning configuration and solid state drives

From: "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Clodoaldo <clodoaldo(dot)pinto(dot)neto(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "PostgreSQL - General ML" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Query planning configuration and solid state drives
Date: 2008-05-30 19:02:23
Message-ID: b42b73150805301202n743ba71i1b5e31fc6c44fd81@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Clodoaldo
<clodoaldo(dot)pinto(dot)neto(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> 2008/5/30 Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>> On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 11:43 AM, Clodoaldo
>> <clodoaldo(dot)pinto(dot)neto(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> What should be changed in the query planning configuration, if at all,
>>> if a ultrafast solid state drive would be used to host a whole
>>> database ? Specially if used in Raid 0 configurations.
>>
>> random_page_cost can probably be reduced...
>>
>> is this flash ssd?
>
> Yes, flash ssd.

Then you are probably aware that sequential speeds are similar to
spinning disk, random access is much, much. (much) better, and random
write is worse.

merlin

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zdenek Kotala 2008-05-30 19:26:52 Re: Connection problem
Previous Message Clodoaldo 2008-05-30 18:55:41 Re: Query planning configuration and solid state drives