Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PQParam version 0.5

From: "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Andrew Chernow" <ac(at)esilo(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PQParam version 0.5
Date: 2007-12-06 19:12:22
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-patches
On Dec 6, 2007 11:58 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I want to buy into the idea that libpq should know explicitly about each
> and every backend datatype.

I don' t necessarily agree with this.  First of all, the server gives
you an oid for the column which introduces the dependency...this has
been the case for a while now.  Secondly, why shouldn't the client
library understand the data the server hands out, at least for
built-in types.

Usings arrays in client side apps is a huge pain...and not efficient
for large arrays.  Same for the variable length geometry types.


In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2007-12-06 19:34:42
Subject: Re: Better default_statistics_target
Previous:From: Andrew ChernowDate: 2007-12-06 18:41:38
Subject: Re: PQParam version 0.5

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group