Re: PQParam version 0.5

From: "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Andrew Chernow" <ac(at)esilo(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PQParam version 0.5
Date: 2007-12-06 19:12:22
Message-ID: b42b73150712061112y51df6c8v4f4920f58fb2e9ad@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

On Dec 6, 2007 11:58 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I want to buy into the idea that libpq should know explicitly about each
> and every backend datatype.

I don' t necessarily agree with this. First of all, the server gives
you an oid for the column which introduces the dependency...this has
been the case for a while now. Secondly, why shouldn't the client
library understand the data the server hands out, at least for
built-in types.

Usings arrays in client side apps is a huge pain...and not efficient
for large arrays. Same for the variable length geometry types.

merlin

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2007-12-06 19:34:42 Re: Better default_statistics_target
Previous Message Andrew Chernow 2007-12-06 18:41:38 Re: PQParam version 0.5