Re: Proposal: generate_iterator functions

From: "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal: generate_iterator functions
Date: 2007-10-18 20:33:06
Message-ID: b42b73150710181333h6cd95782p992131b4230dd788@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10/18/07, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On 10/18/07, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> On the question of being too long, I could live with
> >> generate_subscripts().
>
> > how about array_iota?
>
> I think a lot of people wouldn't get the reference. How about
> array_subscripts()?

works for me..

merlin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2007-10-18 21:13:22 Re: [HACKERS] Why copy_relation_data only use wal whenWALarchivingis enabled
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2007-10-18 20:00:11 Re: Release notes introductory text