From: | "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Vivek Khera" <vivek(at)khera(dot)org> |
Cc: | "Pgsql performance" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Dell Hardware Recommendations |
Date: | 2007-08-10 20:36:07 |
Message-ID: | b42b73150708101336t3823e373he4835aa9564270fb@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-performance |
On 8/10/07, Vivek Khera <vivek(at)khera(dot)org> wrote:
>
> On Aug 9, 2007, at 3:47 PM, Joe Uhl wrote:
>
> > PowerEdge 1950 paired with a PowerVault MD1000
> > 2 x Quad Core Xeon E5310
> > 16 GB 667MHz RAM (4 x 4GB leaving room to expand if we need to)
> > PERC 5/E Raid Adapter
> > 2 x 146 GB SAS in Raid 1 for OS + logs.
> > A bunch of disks in the MD1000 configured in Raid 10 for Postgres
> > data.
>
> I'd avoid Dell disk systems if at all possible. I know, I've been
> through the pain. You really want someone else providing your RAID
> card and disk array, especially if the 5/E card is based on the
> Adaptec devices.
I'm not so sure I agree. They are using LSI firmware now (and so is
everyone else). The servers are well built (highly subjective, I
admit) and configurable. I have had some bad experiences with IBM
gear (adaptec controller though), and white box parts 3ware, etc. I
can tell you that dell got us the storage and the server in record
time
do agree on adaptec however
merlin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joel Fradkin | 2007-08-10 20:36:46 | Re: Dell Hardware Recommendations |
Previous Message | Raymond O'Donnell | 2007-08-10 20:32:34 | Re: SQL question: checking all required items |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joel Fradkin | 2007-08-10 20:36:46 | Re: Dell Hardware Recommendations |
Previous Message | Jeff Frost | 2007-08-10 20:10:02 | Re: How to ENABLE SQL capturing??? |