Re: [PATCHES] pg_standby

From: "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Doug Knight" <dknight(at)wsi(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] pg_standby
Date: 2007-01-17 15:05:00
Message-ID: b42b73150701170705j76a0344csf4cae66ce8ea4793@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On 12/28/06, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-12-28 at 19:26 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-12-14 at 12:04 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > > pg_standby and test framework, in separate .tar files
> >
> > New version (v2), following further testing.
> >
> > Signal handling not included in this version.
>
> Signal handling now added, tested and working correctly in version 3,
> attached.
>
> pg_standby is an example program for a warm standby script as discussed
> on -hackers:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-08/msg00407.php
>
> Program looks complete and ready for review, to me.

I double checked and re-ran all my test and confirmed that pg_standby
move (-m) mode is definitely busted in v3 in the sense that a restart
of the standby will not resume recovery and requires a pg_resetxlog to
become operational -- it needs one more WAL file back than the oldest
one available.

I am currently working around this by rotating WAL files a couple of
versions back in the shell script I am using to receive log files via
netcat. move mode is very desirable because it keeps the maintenance
down for the standby system.

merlin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-01-17 15:07:36 Re: fixing Makefile.shlib for solaris/gcc with -m64 flag
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-01-17 14:53:53 Re: With Function 'Chr', is it a bug?

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Doug Knight 2007-01-17 15:10:00 Re: [PATCHES] pg_standby
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-01-17 14:53:53 Re: With Function 'Chr', is it a bug?