Re: Performance problem with query

From: "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Christian Rengstl" <Christian(dot)Rengstl(at)klinik(dot)uni-regensburg(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Performance problem with query
Date: 2006-07-14 13:59:19
Message-ID: b42b73150607140659u3a163980keed67c91d7cdc9e3@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 7/14/06, Christian Rengstl
<Christian(dot)Rengstl(at)klinik(dot)uni-regensburg(dot)de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> somehow my reply yesterday got lost, but nevertheless here comes the
> explain analyze again. It's the explain of the operation that causes
> this huge performance discrepancy. Unfortunately i had to perform the
> explain analyze with an empty temp_table, because after the whole
> operation is done, i delete the data again to save some space.

that's not much help. remember that explain analyze actually performs
your query. so next time you run it, do explain analyze and post
results here. just quick tip: run analyze before you run your big
query.

merlin

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alban Hertroys 2006-07-14 14:18:57 Re: Q: Table scans on set difference
Previous Message Christian Rengstl 2006-07-14 13:22:43 Antw: Problem with archive_command