Re: Installing PostgreSQL on Win 2003 R2 64-bit

From: "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: "Aly Dharshi" <aly(dot)dharshi(at)telus(dot)net>, "Stanislaw Tristan" <admin(at)zestad(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Installing PostgreSQL on Win 2003 R2 64-bit
Date: 2006-04-28 17:02:59
Message-ID: b42b73150604281002t11e15ecchebf7daacb357e32d@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 4/28/06, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
> >> On 4/27/06, Aly Dharshi <aly(dot)dharshi(at)telus(dot)net> wrote:
> >> Either of these approaches could work, but expect to be
> >> hacking around wierd problems. There is decent chance pgsql
> >> will be officially supported on windows as of 8.2, scheduled
> >> for release this summer.
>
> > Um. That's the first I heard 8.2 was scheduled for release this summer.
> > AFAIK the curernt time-estimate is that it shuld go beta towards the end
> > of the summer, which means a release sometime Q4 if we follow previous
> > patterns.

hm, ok. I thought freeze was jul 1. which would have put release in
late summer (or fall)...oh well.

> I was kind of amused by the bit about "officially supported as of 8.2",
> too. That doesn't have anything to do with any reality I know of.

By that I meant Mangus's msvc patch would be accepted into core
sources for 8.2. What I was trying to indicate was that there is a
decent chance of being able to build via msvc in 8.2...I expect (hope)
that this will happen...sorry to sound presumptious though.

Merlin

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruno Wolff III 2006-04-28 17:04:16 Re: A few things on intervals
Previous Message David Fetter 2006-04-28 17:01:11 Re: Checking for Foreign Keys constraining a record?