On 2/8/06, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Just for the record, it's not the row constructor stuff that just got
> fixed, it's row-value comparison. We were able to construct rows
> correctly before, but we didn't compare them in the correct column-
> by-column fashion. Please call it by the right name in your blog to
> avoid future confusion.
right..that was poor phrasing on my part. will fix....
merlin